Battling Big Business
Foreword
Naomi
Klein
When under attack,
every entity has the right to self-defence, whether that entity is an
individual, a state or a corporation. And large corporations are indeed
facing mounting attacks these days, coming from a public angered by everything
from sweatshop labour to genetic engineering.
They have the right
to fight back. To correct critics when they are wrong. To put forward
their perspective in their own words. To try to win the argument. But
make no mistake: this book does not tell the story of corporations defending
themselves against public concern and criticism with facts, arguments
and improved practices. It tells the story of a few very powerful multinationals
and their lobbyists using, in Eveline Lubbers words, a bag
of dirty tricks against their critics, from setting up fake activist
organizations, to sending in spies to infiltrate meetings, to pressuring
the state to treat legitimate activists like terrorists. Sometimes companies
adopt the language of their opponents (calling gas-guzzling cars eco-warriors,
for instance); sometimes they exhaust their critics limited resources
by tying them up in court for years (as in McDonalds infamous McLibel
case). Either way, the aim is not to win an argument but to contain, intimidate
and ultimately eliminate the opposition. Indeed, what becomes painfully
clear in reading this important book is that it is not the substance of
the criticism that so galls these massive corporations, but the very fact
that they must face critics at all.
Through case studies
and analyses, Battling Big Business exposes a spirit of intolerance coursing
through the corporate world: intolerance of criticism and dissent, as
well as a deep aversion to public scrutiny and accountability. The great
irony is that post-September 11, many of these same companies have rushed
to align themselves with the war on terrorism, wrapping themselves
in the US flag and claiming that their logos are symbols of freedom and
democracy in the face of tyranny and censorship. Some business lobbyists
and business-friendly politicians have even begun using the symbolism
of the attack on the World Trade Center to argue that these acts of terrorism
represent an extreme expression of the ideas held by peaceful and reasoned
critics of corporate abuses. Italys Silvio Berlusconi, for instance,
has argued that the terrorist attacks were simply the far end of a continuum
of anti-American and anti-corporate sentiment, attempting, not so subtly,
to link the protesters on the streets of Genoa during the 2001 G-8 meeting
with murderous religious zealots.
What has become clear
is that alongside the military war waged by the US government, an international
propaganda war is also being waged, one attempting to bundle
support for pro-business policies into the war on terrorism. United States
Trade Representative Robert Zoellick has even claimed that trade promotes
the values at the heart of this protracted struggle, so the US,
he says, needs a new campaign to fight terror with trade.
The message coming
from the companies profiled in this book is the same: criticizing business
is illegitimate and must be eliminated at all costs. Any tactic employed
to achieve this end is acceptable, from wilful misrepresentation to covert
operations. Any tactic, that is, except the obvious ones: honest public
debate and open airings of divergent views. So in the end this book is
about democracy. It is about a handful of companies that treat it with
disdain, while never hesitating to use the rhetoric of democracy to accumulate
higher profits. And it is about growing numbers of activists who, despite
facing escalating attacks from the state and corporate world, are insisting
on their right to express dissent, openly and vocally.
Its worth remembering
that corporate campaigning re-emerged as a dominant activist tactic precisely
because our democracies were imperilled long before September 11. With
governments unwilling to take on powerful corporations for fear of their
countries being branded uncompetitive places to invest, environmentalists
and labour activists naturally began looking for new places to exert pressure
on important public policy issues. The result is that political debates
over everything from global warming to labour standards are now taking
place less in the halls of government than between activists and corporationshand-to-brand.
These campaigns are not reflexively anti-business, rather they are part
of a swelling international movement to reclaim the most basic of our
democratic rights: the right to have a direct say in how our societies
are governed. When politicians willingly bow to the forces of the market,
politics necessarily spills into the streets, from Seattle to New Delhi,
Genoa to Buenos Aires. This trend isnt anti-democratic, as some
have argued, it is the very essence of democracy.
As regular people
have crashed elite gatherings by the hundreds of thousands, the response
from many states has been severe: globalization activists around the world
have been met with tear gas, pepper spray, mass arrests, beatings and
bullets. And, as this book shows, the response from the corporate world,
while harder to see at first, has been equally real. For
activists, the most compelling reason to understand how corporations are
responding to their campaigns is the need to stay nimble, to realize when
actions are being anticipated and subverted by public relations companies,
often with the help of newly hired recruits from Greenpeace and Friends
of the Earth. Yet for those who dont identify as activists, but
believe in the principles of open debate and free expression, this book
should serve as a warning. Post-September 11, many of the strategies used
to silence anti-corporate activists are being used against much broader
segments of the population: university professors with unpopular views
about Israel, engineers of Middle-Eastern descent who show a keen interest
in politics, journalists who criticize US military strategy.
All around us freedoms
are being taken lightly and power is being exercised with a heavy hand.
If there was ever a moment to insist on the right to vigorously challenge
authority, it is now. If there was ever a book to help us do it, this
is it.